Casino royale poker scene

casino royale poker scene

Poker is prominent in the James Bond film " Casino Royale," to illustrate why, let's take a look at the climactic poker scene in the film. Your browser does not currently recognize any of the video formats available. Click here to visit our frequently. Last hand of the poker tournament in the movie Casino Royale (), in which Daniel Craig aka James Bond beats the bad guy Le Chiffre and grabs $. casino royale poker scene

Online: Casino royale poker scene

Casino royale poker scene 262
Games slot machine free Book of ra spielothek
Casino royale poker scene Hack flash games
Casino royale poker scene 959
The final poker hand self. AA versus AK, what do you think happens? By folding, LeChiffre would have had 2 players eliminated. All in all, just a weird hand. Except I think the point of that scene is that Mike is too caught up in his hand to think about the rest of the cards. Presumably there weren't any pre-flop raises, because Bond is playing a hand he really shouldn't be, and he only flops the open-ended straight flush, not the nuts. Sure, he has the stack to handle any nonsense from the short stacks, but why bother? Plenty of people fold full houses, especially in tournament play. And you're overlooking one HUGE. But he should also be shoving flush draws off the hand, which he didn't. By folding, LeChiffre would have had 2 players eliminated. This time around, he did gratis nummern same thing. Well, the film was scripted inliterally right at the white hot peak of the poker boom Chris Moneymaker won the WSOP in Watch these videos of poker hands I've pulled from YouTube, and come back and tell me that you still believe in what you're saying, i.

Casino royale poker scene Video

Last poker hand in Casino Royale (2006) That's the point, though. Same goes for anyone on a flush draw, and really, anyone who paired with the board. I'm definitely not saying that he would be raising with suited every time or even half the time. AA versus AK, what do you think happens? Now that I think about it, the only real explanation is that LeChiffre thought that Bond was outright bluffing with a terrible hand as opposed to Bond having a legitimately strong hand and trying to get value out of something like an A-4 boat, i. But, no, 57s is definitely NOT a raising hand in general. Posts are automatically archived after 6 months. He knew he'd probably never get such good odds again, and he was probably right. But in this case, LeChiffre's a Bond villain, which means he needs an identity, an essence, a skill set, i. To me, I think the important part is the fact that he has most everyone besides bond covered easily. What do you do? First of all, it wasn't a mistake to play big on a big hand, but he certainly could have played more conservatively and possibly even folded that hand in fear of AAAKK or JJJJ since there was likely preflop action.

Tags: No tags

0 Responses